.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Wednesday, August 03, 2005

 

On Second Thought...


So much for that.
August 4, 2005
President Makes It Clear Phrase Is 'War on Terror'

By RICHARD W. STEVENSON
GRAPEVINE, Tex., Aug. 3 - President Bush publicly overruled some of his top advisers on Wednesday in a debate about what to call the conflict with Islamic extremists, saying, "Make no mistake about it, we are at war."

In a speech here, Mr. Bush used the phrase "war on terror" no less than five times. Not once did he refer to the "global struggle against violent extremism," the wording consciously adopted by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and other officials in recent weeks after internal deliberations about the best way to communicate how the United States views the challenge it is facing.

In recent public appearances, Mr. Rumsfeld and senior military officers have avoided formulations using the word "war," and some of Mr. Bush's top advisers have suggested that the administration wanted to jettison what had been its semiofficial wording of choice, "the global war on terror."

In an interview last week about the new wording, Stephen J. Hadley, Mr. Bush's national security adviser, said that the conflict was "more than just a military war on terror" and that the United States needed to counter "the gloomy vision" of the extremists and "offer a positive alternative."

But administration officials became concerned when some news reports linked the change in language to signals of a shift in policy. At the same time, Mr. Bush, by some accounts, told aides that he was not happy with the new phrasing, a change of tone from the wording he had consistently used since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

It is not clear whether the new language embraced by other administration officials was adopted without Mr. Bush's approval or whether he reversed himself after the change was made. Either way, he planted himself on Wednesday firmly on the side of framing the conflict primarily in military terms and appeared intent on emphasizing that there had been no change in American policy.
Ok, so here's what we think happened: Karen Huges returned to the team and came up with "the global conflict against violent extremism" and everyone--except Karl Rove--agreed. GWB went along because he'll do whatever anyone tells him, and because Rove held his tongue (for once).

A week later, newspapers in hand, Rove convinced him it had been a bad idea all along, and GWB agreed. So now everyone on the team is in retreat, trying to have it both ways.

Rejoice, patriotic Americans--the wheels are falling off the totalitarian bus that is the Bush White House.

Comments:
I think G-SAVE was a trial balloon. When it fell flat, Bush got to look Presidential by declaring was all over again. A win-win situation for the Prez. Really, what's the downside to this story? None for the Bush Administration. The major media would never call him on the name change.
 
For what it's worth, my take on "GWOT."

http://noruleshere.blogspot.com/2005/07/lemon-refreshed-policy.html
 
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

All material on this site © 2002-2007 201k.com - All Rights Reserved.