Monday, February 26, 2007
Well, son, it's a mystery...
Let's see if we understand this correctly:
If you say you've found the shroud in which a man was buried 2,000 years ago, it's completely plausible, and a matter of serious scientific debate.
But if you claim you've found the grave of that man, it's an impossibility and an outrage.
Do we have this right?
If you say you've found the shroud in which a man was buried 2,000 years ago, it's completely plausible, and a matter of serious scientific debate.
But if you claim you've found the grave of that man, it's an impossibility and an outrage.
Do we have this right?
